info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page

High Court appeals to be heard in open court?

by reporting watch team | Oct 30, 2016 | FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

The press reported this week that an appeal involving Essex County Council was the first to be routed through the High Court, under new rules that have diverted some appeals from the Court of Appeal to High Court judges as a result of the Court of Appeal having an...

Family Court Reporting Watch: Weekly Round Up

by reporting watch team | Oct 29, 2016 | FCReportingWatch

• Correcting, clarifying and commenting on media reports of family court cases • Explaining and commenting on published Judgments of family cases • Highlighting other transparency news   MEDIA REPORTS OF FAMILY COURTS CASES   The Sun followed the Mirror in...

Ellie Butler case debated in House of Lords

by reporting watch team | Oct 26, 2016 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch

The Children And Social Work Bill is going through Parliament at present. It has been controversial due to parts which some have said would allow social services to be privatised and which could remove current safeguards. This post is about another aspect of the Bill,...

Transparency: the Perfect Storm

by Sarah P | Oct 23, 2016 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The recent decisions of Hayden J concerning a 7 year old boy, whose mother insisted he wished to be raised as a girl, set out a wide variety of the issues that concern the Transparency Project and which have provoked strong emotion for many readers. a complicated set...

If your ex takes your child to the other end of the country should the court treat it as abduction?

by reporting watch team | Oct 22, 2016 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The Court of Appeal has clarified the question of how courts should deal with cases where one parent takes a child to live in a distant part of the country without the agreement of the other. The case is Re R (Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1016 (20 October 2016) and the full...

Family Court Reporting Watch: Weekly Round-Up

by reporting watch team | Oct 22, 2016 | FCReportingWatch

• Correcting, clarifying and commenting on media reports of family cases • Explaining and commenting on published Judgments of family cases • Highlighting other transparency news   MEDIA REPORTS OF FAMILY COURTS CASES:   ‘Judge orders boy, seven, to...

The terrifying tale of how Britain’s most secret court imprisoned a grandmother (AKA Court enforces its own orders and publishes judgment for the world to see)

by reporting watch team | Oct 21, 2016 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This week Christopher Booker, chose this as his topic for his Sunday Telegraph column :   The terrifying tale of how Britain’s most secret court imprisoned a grandmother   This is of course a very worrying headline. The article itself is also likely to...

Advertising children for adoptive parents in the national press

by reporting watch team | Oct 20, 2016 | FCReportingWatch

There have been four adverts for adoptive parents for children in the Mirror this week with another due tomorrow for  ‘National Adoption Week’. They are here: ‘Will you be my forever parents?’ Heartbreaking story of boy who wants to be adopted’;...

Press regulation: why we are unimpressed by IPSO

by Paul M | Oct 17, 2016 | Comment, Transparency News

There are many things wrong with the way the national press reports legal matters, especially matters relating to the Family Court and the Court of Protection. But they are not going to get better unless and until the so-called regulator, IPSO, takes firmer action to...

The Court of Protection’s not so secret anymore, but the press don’t seem to have noticed

by Julie Doughty | Oct 15, 2016 | Cases, Court of Protection

In the words of the song, the ‘secret’ Court of Protection is ‘no secret anymore’ because since January 2016, hearings are held in open court, unless the circumstances are exceptional. Applications for committal for contempt are always held in...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Hilary Searing on Sara Sharif -what we now know from the Safeguarding Review
  • Thoughtful on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Bayes on Trying to report the family courts – a BBC reporter’s experience
  • Diana Jordan on Repealing ‘the presumption” – an explainer
  • Sarah on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary

Search for something in particular

More search options

December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Nov    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.