info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Has the revolution happened? Can we ever go back?

Has the revolution happened? Can we ever go back?

by Paul M | Aug 25, 2020 | Consultations, Transparency News, Trends

The Lord Chief Justice called it “the biggest pilot project that the justice system has ever seen” and said “there will be no going back to February 2020”. Remote court hearings would have come sooner or later, but thanks to Covid-19 they came at us fast, in March...
The Spotlight Review on domestic abuse – where does it fit in with other court reforms?

The Spotlight Review on domestic abuse – where does it fit in with other court reforms?

by Julie Doughty | Jul 24, 2020 | Comment, Consultations, FCReportingWatch

The work undertaken by the ‘spotlight panel’ appointed by the Ministry of Justice, reported in what is being referred to as the ‘harm report’, has already been commented on here and here. Its full title is ‘Assessing Risk of Harm to Children and Parents in Private Law...
Spotlight Review: Breaking the Cycle of Failure for LIPs?

Spotlight Review: Breaking the Cycle of Failure for LIPs?

by Guest Post | Jul 1, 2020 | Comment, Consultations, Trends

This is a guest post by Dr Jess Mant, Lecturer in Law at Cardiff University School of Law and Politics. Jess was recently awarded a PhD for her study on ‘Litigants in Person and the Family Court: The Accessibility of Private Family Justice After LASPO’. We...
Civil Justice Council Rapid Consultation: The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system

Civil Justice Council Rapid Consultation: The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system

by Paul M | May 19, 2020 | Consultations, Transparency News, Trends

Following the rapid consultation on the use of remote hearings in the family justice system, undertaken by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory at the request of the President of the Family Division, the Civil Justice Council have now embarked on a similar...
Transparency Review Call For Evidence Closes – Our Response

Transparency Review Call For Evidence Closes – Our Response

by Lucy R | May 11, 2020 | Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

The President of the Family Division’s Transparency Review Panel put out a call for evidence in the early months of the year, before Covid-19 darkened our doors. Today the several-times-extended deadline for that call for evidence fell due. The Transparency...
The future of journalism: our response to the inquiry

The future of journalism: our response to the inquiry

by Paul M | May 6, 2020 | Consultations, Trends

The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee is currently holding an inquiry into the future of journalism. “This inquiry will investigate how digital technologies are changing the production and consumption of journalism, how journalists can be...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Linda on Sara Sharif -what we now know from the Safeguarding Review
  • Anon on Why doesn’t the family court punish professionals who break the rules?
  • Louisa Biggs on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Lainie on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Julie Doughty on ‘Habitual Residence’ – sloppy explanations of the law about child abduction

Search for something in particular

More search options

May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 IPSO journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation pathfinder publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.