info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
President’s guidance as to reporting on family courts

President’s guidance as to reporting on family courts

by Julie Doughty | Nov 1, 2019 | FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

As part of the decision made by the President of the Family Division in the appeal by TP member, Louise Tickle in February, Sir Andrew McFarlane stated that guidance to courts would need to be issued to address the uncertainty that existed if a journalist or legal...
Nuffield Family Justice Observatory: Supporting better outcomes for children through research

Nuffield Family Justice Observatory: Supporting better outcomes for children through research

by Julie Doughty | Oct 27, 2019 | Resources, Transparency News

Some readers may remember the ‘research-led family justice system’ envisaged in the Norgrove Family Justice Review in 2011. However, we’re still waiting and, as Sir James Munby explained in this interview, family court professionals can sometimes...
A new case on the ‘shaken baby’ problem

A new case on the ‘shaken baby’ problem

by Julie Doughty | Oct 20, 2019 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

TP and TS [2019] EWHC B51 concerns baby twins who had been born prematurely at 31 weeks and who subsequently experienced serious physical trauma that may have been attributable to their parents. The good news is that the court has arrived at a conclusion that the...

‘The problems are huge’: teenagers in care living in caravan parks

by Julie Doughty | Oct 11, 2019 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

HHJ Dancey explains at the outset of this case, Dorset Council v A (Residential Placement: Lack of Resources) [2019] EWFC 62 that he has spoken to A, aged 15, about his intention to ‘tell her story’ and that he is writing the judgment with her and her...
Can parents agree to a 16 year old being detained?

Can parents agree to a 16 year old being detained?

by Julie Doughty | Sep 28, 2019 | Cases, Court of Protection, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

As a result of a new Supreme Court judgment, local authorities will no longer be able to offer residential care, with parents’ agreement, to 16 and 17 year olds where they are supervised and not free to leave – unless there is a court order. This decision...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Jennie on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks
  • DAVID EGGINS on Where’s me DAPPs? (the end of perpetrators’ programmes)
  • Julie Doughty on ‘Paedophiles to be stripped of parental rights’? and other failed legislative amendments
  • Elizabeth Walsh on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Anon on ‘Paedophiles to be stripped of parental rights’? and other failed legislative amendments

Search for something in particular

More search options

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok