info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
A view from the front row – a barrister’s perspective of the family court’s mishandling of children cases involving domestic abuse

A view from the front row – a barrister’s perspective of the family court’s mishandling of children cases involving domestic abuse

by Guest Post | Jul 3, 2019 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post from Dr Charlotte Proudman. Charlotte is a family law barrister at Goldsmith Chambers specialising in violence against women and girls. She tweets as @DrProudman. On 21 June 2019, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) announcedthe identity of the...
Children Cases in the Family Court – Interim Proposals for Reform (Private Law)

Children Cases in the Family Court – Interim Proposals for Reform (Private Law)

by reporting watch team | Jul 3, 2019 | Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Trends

Following on from our post summarising the key recommendations from Mr Justice Keehan’s Public Law Working Group which can be found here, we now turn our attention to the issue of private law. The Child Arrangements Programme (the ‘CAP’) was introduced as a...
Children Cases in the Family Court – Interim Proposals for Reform (Public Law)

Children Cases in the Family Court – Interim Proposals for Reform (Public Law)

by reporting watch team | Jul 3, 2019 | Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Trends

Today, the President of the Family Court Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, published interim reports from his Public and Private Law Working Groups. The President opened with a short statement on his concerns around both the rising volume of care cases before the...
‘Custody fights blight four in ten break ups’ – A word of caution?

‘Custody fights blight four in ten break ups’ – A word of caution?

by Kelly Reeve | Jul 2, 2019 | Analysis, Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a first post from Kelly Reeve, new contributor, who tweets as @s37CA89research. Kelly recently completed a socio-legal research study on the use of section 37 Children Act 1989 at UEA.  She was formerly a legal adviser at Coram Children’s Legal...
Transparency Reform: as one door closes…

Transparency Reform: as one door closes…

by reporting watch team | Jun 30, 2019 | FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

In May, the President of the Family Division published draft guidance to help those dealing with applications by reporters to relax reporting restrictions. The President published that draft guidance for consultation purposes and we’ve now submitted our...
The Habberfields and the Hab-not-a-fields

The Habberfields and the Hab-not-a-fields

by Guest Post | Jun 29, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Charlotte John. “The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep.” Robert Frost, Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening Last year saw an abundant crop of “proprietary estoppel” disputes between...
Children Cases in the Family Court – Interim Proposals for Reform (Private Law)

Does registering your baby make them “property of the State”?

by Annie Surviving Safeguarding | Jun 26, 2019 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

[COMMENTS ARE NOW CLOSED] This is a post by “Annie”, one half of our Project Coordination team at the Transparency Project. Annie is a birth mum who has experienced several sets of public and private law proceedings including a new-born removal, and that...
Expert Witnesses: The Crisis in Family Courts

Expert Witnesses: The Crisis in Family Courts

by Malvika Jaganmohan | Jun 26, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a first post from Malvika Jaganmohan, one of our new contributors. Malvika tweets as @MalvikaJaganmo1 Any family lawyer will tell you that finding a competent independent expert who can report in a timely manner is the Holy Grail of the family justice...
The family court in an era of austerity: problems and priorities – Sir James Munby

The family court in an era of austerity: problems and priorities – Sir James Munby

by Paul M | Jun 26, 2019 | Comment, Trends

The online divorce project has been a “triumphant success”, according to a recent speech by Sir James Munby, but the family justice system as a whole is “inadequately funded and resourced”

Who are the Beatles? And can they fix my computer?

Who are the Beatles? And can they fix my computer?

by Lucy R | Jun 24, 2019 | FCReportingWatch

The press love a story about out of touch judges – think ‘Who are The Beatles?’. And so with this headline in the Mail Online : ‘Technophobe’ judges delay £1.2bn justice system reforms as plan to use new software in family court hearings...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • S on A failed reunification plan
  • Charles Prest on Sir James Munby’s greatest hits: an appreciation of his work
  • Lucy Reed on Sending a mother to prison for contempt of court
  • Lucy Reed on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Lucy Reed on Children and parents speak up about the Pathfinder in private law – new research published

Search for something in particular

More search options

February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
« Jan    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.