info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Separating the divorce from the money bit

Separating the divorce from the money bit

by reporting watch team | May 21, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

When married couples and civil partners separate there are two (or three) parts to the legal arrangements : getting divorced (called dissolution if you are in a civil partnership), sorting out the money, and sorting out arrangements for any children. The way the law...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | May 20, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news   MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURTS CASES    As yet unclear Police...
Police investigating drug testing lab that carried out tests for the Family Court

Police investigating drug testing lab that carried out tests for the Family Court

by reporting watch team | May 20, 2017 | Cases, FCReportingWatch

There have been news reports recently about failures at a forensic lab in Manchester, which was used for forensic testing in criminal cases. It was reported earlier this month that “Scores of convictions [are] in doubt amid forensic test manipulation...
“Top Judge threatens to down tools rather than allow victims to be quizzed by abusers in his court”

“Top Judge threatens to down tools rather than allow victims to be quizzed by abusers in his court”

by reporting watch team | May 19, 2017 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

…Or so we imagine the headlines may run if and when a member of the press reads as far as the bottom few paragraphs of the unassuming A (A Minor : Fact Finding; Unrepresented Party) [2017] EWHC 1195 (Fam) (19 May 2017), a recent judgment of Mr Justice Anthony...
Poppi’s dad to rake in money?

Poppi’s dad to rake in money?

by reporting watch team | May 17, 2017 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

POPPI’S DAD’S CASH Accused dad of ‘abused’ tot Poppi Worthington to trouser thousands more in legal aid for inquest Paul Worthington, 49, got £117,000 in public cash for a custody battle over his other kids and is now set to rake in more   Above is...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Sidisi Henry on ‘Habitual Residence’ – sloppy explanations of the law about child abduction
  • Julie Doughty on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Michael Freeman on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Jag Burns on Happy endings in East London Family Court – legal blogging under the extended Reporting Pilot
  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary

Search for something in particular

More search options

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation parental responsibility privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.