info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
The Sammy Woodhouse Story and Associated Campaigns – An Update

The Sammy Woodhouse Story and Associated Campaigns – An Update

by Lucy R | Dec 1, 2018 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

When we first posted on Tuesday about the Sammy Woodhouse story as it appeared in The Times (initially an anonymous story but swiftly identified as a story about Sammy and her son) the only real source of information was The Times itself (and a brief video posted on...
Did a council ‘act perversely’ to offer a jailed rapist a chance to see his victim’s child?

Did a council ‘act perversely’ to offer a jailed rapist a chance to see his victim’s child?

by Lucy R | Nov 27, 2018 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Today sees another Andrew Norfolk front page article in The Times about the wrongs committed in the Family Court and by social services. Sadly, just like last time, this is a sensationalised headline and article which ignores some important facts and legal...

Sir James Munby sums up his views on transparency

by Lucy R | Nov 12, 2018 | FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

Family Law publishes a regular column by The Transparency Project. This blog post originally appeared in the October 2018 issue, [2018] Fam Law 1342. The outgoing President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, gave a press conference...
A Big Step For The Transparency Project

A Big Step For The Transparency Project

by Lucy R | Oct 9, 2018 | FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

In August we advertised for applications to fill the role of Project Coordinator at The Transparency Project – the person appointed would be the first employee in the project’s history, so this represents something of a step forwards for us. We received...
Inaugural Legal Blogging Day

Inaugural Legal Blogging Day

by Lucy R | Oct 2, 2018 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

Yesterday, 1 October, was the first day of the new legal bloggers pilot. Having spent many hours persuading the powers that be that this was a good idea to try out, it seemed like the done thing to be there on Day One. So, shortly before 10am I trotted from Chambers...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Courtney Cummings on Access to Family Court documents under the open justice principle
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • S on A failed reunification plan
  • Charles Prest on Sir James Munby’s greatest hits: an appreciation of his work
  • Lucy Reed on Sending a mother to prison for contempt of court

Search for something in particular

More search options

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.