info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Are we still ‘Amusing Ourselves to Death’ and if so, at what cost to children?

Are we still ‘Amusing Ourselves to Death’ and if so, at what cost to children?

by reporting watch team | Aug 30, 2017 | Comment

This is a guest blog post by Marion Oswald Senior Fellow at The Centre for Information Rights, University of Winchester, examining the British and Irish Law Education and Technology Association (BILETA) consultation run by The Centre of Information Rights. The...
Cafcass response to the Transparency Project comments on their draft revised Framework

Cafcass response to the Transparency Project comments on their draft revised Framework

by reporting watch team | Aug 30, 2017 | Comment, Consultations

On 11 August, the Cafcass policy and communications team emailed us in reply to our comments on their revised framework. We explain what they said below. We will now write again, as well as alert them to this blog through twitter. They told us (our summary not their...
Primacy of children’s interests in the publicity debate

Primacy of children’s interests in the publicity debate

by David Burrows | Aug 29, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Transparency News

Freedom of expression: are children’s interests ‘paramount’?   In her update on transparency on the Transparency Project blog ‘Lucy R’  raised what has been said by Sir James Munby P: that ‘the interests of the child are NOT paramount on questions of...

Religious and cultural identity in foster care

by Sarah P | Aug 28, 2017 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

On 28th August 2017 The Times published a story about a white Christian  child ‘forced’ into a (presumably) brown skinned Muslim family The prominent placement of this report on the front page with its eerie image of the little white girl being led away by...
What we’re thinking: the Family Court Adviser’s article

What we’re thinking: the Family Court Adviser’s article

by Lucy R | Aug 26, 2017 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

An anonymous family court adviser (CAFCASS Officer) wrote an article for the Guardian this week: What I’m really thinking: the family court adviser. The strapline reads “Both parents are usually adamant that the other is a complete nightmare”. That is a...
Statistics and headlines in legal news: controlling the surges

Statistics and headlines in legal news: controlling the surges

by Barbara Rich | Aug 25, 2017 | Comment

A few months ago, Paul Magrath wrote a post on the figures behind the Daily Telegraph’s headline “financial abuse rockets as more powers of attorney challenged by courts”, showing that the rocket turned out to be a very small damp squib. The subject of that post...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Courtney Cummings on Access to Family Court documents under the open justice principle
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • anon on Threshold Criteria
  • S on A failed reunification plan

Search for something in particular

More search options

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.