info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Human Rights Court criticises adoption case from Norway

Human Rights Court criticises adoption case from Norway

by Julie Doughty | Sep 20, 2019 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The case of Strand Lobben and others v. Norway 37282/13 raises issues about the human rights of birth mothers in adoption proceedings. In the context of all the discussions currently going on about human rights in adoption, it’s disappointing, despite having gone...
Lomax v Lomax – must parties consent to Early Neutral Evaluation process?

Lomax v Lomax – must parties consent to Early Neutral Evaluation process?

by Paul M | Sep 17, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Explanation

In an appeal from a decision made by a family judge in an inheritance dispute, the Court of Appeal has ruled that the consent of the parties is not needed for a court to order them to submit their case to an ENE, or “early neutral evaluation”. So what...
Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 5 (final day) of the High Court hearing

Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 5 (final day) of the High Court hearing

by Emma Nottingham | Sep 15, 2019 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

Day 5 continued with submissions from Vikram Sachdeva QC, representing Tafida, instructed by her aunt as litigation friend. He submitted that the court should take no difference between adults and children in principle. Both should look at best interests in light of...
Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 5 (final day) of the High Court hearing

Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 4 in the High Court

by Emma Nottingham | Sep 13, 2019 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

As mentioned in my first blog post this week, there are two cases being heard. The first three days heard the first case, which was an application for judicial review. This application was made by Tafida’s parents to consider the legality of the decision of the...
Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 5 (final day) of the High Court hearing

Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 3 in the High Court

by Emma Nottingham | Sep 11, 2019 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

The facts of the case and summaries of day 1 and 2 can be viewed here: Tafida Raqeeb: First Day of the High Court Case Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 2 in the High Court. Day 3 of the hearing continued with Katie Gollop QC’s submissions for Barts NHS Health Trust. She...
Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 5 (final day) of the High Court hearing

Tafida Raqeeb Case: Day 2 in the High Court.

by reporting watch team | Sep 11, 2019 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

Day 2 of the hearing (Tuesday) saw David Lock QC, counsel for the parents continue his submissions, and Katie Gollop QC commence hers on behalf of Barts NHS Health Trust. David Lock QC stated that medical decision-making is about more than just medical best interests....
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Andrew on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Julie Doughty on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Celia Kitzinger on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • anonymous on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Jennie on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks

Search for something in particular

More search options

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok