info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page

Guardian report that a ‘radical trial’ of family court hearings in public is about to be announced

by reporting watch team | Dec 30, 2016 | Comment, Court of Protection, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

“Certain family court hearings to take place in public in radical trial” claimed the Guardian headline on the night before Christmas Eve. “James Munby, head of high court’s family division, to continue far-reaching reforms to bring more transparency to the system”...
Ex-MP says ‘open justice’ rules ‘must be followed to the letter’

Ex-MP says ‘open justice’ rules ‘must be followed to the letter’

by reporting watch team | Dec 29, 2016 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

The Press Association have covered a case concerning the potential committal to prison of a Polish woman involved in care proceedings, it appears for publication of information concerning her child via an interview with Polish media which was aired in Poland and...

The GD the BD and the very very ugly

by reporting watch team | Dec 21, 2016 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Mr Justice Cobb’s judgment in the case of GD & BD (Children) (Rev 1) [2016] EWHC 3312 (Fam) (20 December 2016) was published this week. It has already been described by Suesspicious Minds blog as the worst case of 2016, not without good reason. It...
Girl’s rape claim upheld in Leeds despite prior no-trial decision

Girl’s rape claim upheld in Leeds despite prior no-trial decision

by reporting watch team | Dec 21, 2016 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This headline ran in The Guardian on Monday. You can read the article here : Girl’s rape claim upheld in Leeds despite prior no-trial decision The article explains that although a decision had earlier been taken not to prosecute through the criminal courts, the...
Family Court Reporting Watch:  Weekly Round Up

Family Court Reporting Watch: Weekly Round Up

by reporting watch team | Dec 18, 2016 | FCReportingWatch

  Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases   Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases   Highlighting other transparency news   MEDIA REPORTS   Christopher Booker commented again...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Sidisi Henry on ‘Habitual Residence’ – sloppy explanations of the law about child abduction
  • Julie Doughty on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Michael Freeman on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Jag Burns on Happy endings in East London Family Court – legal blogging under the extended Reporting Pilot
  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary

Search for something in particular

More search options

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation parental responsibility privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.