info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
The Transparency Project
  • Blog
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page

Women’s Aid answer our queries about their evidence base

by Lucy R | Jan 11, 2017 | Comment, Events

We have been in dialogue with Women’s Aid about assertions made by them that family courts frequently breach PD12J (practice direction in the Family Courts concerning domestic abuse) by allowing victims to be cross examined by their abusers. We wanted to...

Should the standard of proof for child sexual abuse be lowered so that more of those accused can be tried and convicted in the criminal courts?

by Louise Tickle | Jan 25, 2016 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Notorious

Should the standard of proof for child sexual abuse be lowered so that more of those accused can be tried and convicted in the criminal courts? This seemed to be the argument being made by Anne Longfield, children’s commissioner for England, on the Today programme...

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Andrew on Court hearing lists and open justice
  • Lucy Reed on Can an adoption order be undone?
  • Helen on Something is going on with experts
  • claire griffin on English councils confirm they set targets for the number of children to be adopted 
  • Charlotte on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary

Search for something in particular

More search options

Main Menu

  • Blog
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.