info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Divorce doom?  Why last week’s “surge” in divorces doesn’t spell mayhem for marriage

Divorce doom?  Why last week’s “surge” in divorces doesn’t spell mayhem for marriage

by Jo Edwards | Apr 19, 2022 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Jo Edwards, Partner and Head of Family, Forsters LLP. Jo tweets as @MissJoEdwards. The headline in last Wednesday’s Daily Mail, a week to the day since the new no fault divorce process was introduced in England and Wales, was as...
Divorce doom?  Why last week’s “surge” in divorces doesn’t spell mayhem for marriage

A Comparison between the Old and New Divorce Law

by Guest Post | Mar 23, 2022 | Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

This is a guest post by Teena Dhanota-Jones. Teena is a partner and head of the family law department at Portner Law Limited. She tweets as @DhanotaJones I have set out below the law for divorce and dissolution of civil partnerships started before 31...
An example of a family court judgment where the parties are named

An example of a family court judgment where the parties are named

by Lucy R | Oct 7, 2021 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

We’ve spotted an interesting decision from last month where a High Court Judge has published a judgment in connection with a jurisdictional dispute arising from a husband’s nullity petition, along with the names of both parties. The husband contended the...
Do a fifth of marrying couples sign a pre-nup?

Do a fifth of marrying couples sign a pre-nup?

by Guest Post | Sep 5, 2021 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Tony Roe, divorce and family law solicitor and arbitrator, and visiting fellow in family law, University of Reading. Tony tweets as @TonyRoeDivorce The Marriage Foundation has hit the headlines with its research paper entitled “One in five...
Setting aside a financial remedy consent order in Covid pandemic times: HW & WW(2021) EWFC B20

Setting aside a financial remedy consent order in Covid pandemic times: HW & WW(2021) EWFC B20

by reporting watch team | Aug 6, 2021 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This is post by Elizabeth Wark. Elizabeth is a barrister at Three Doctor Johnson’s Buildings specialising in civil and family law. She tweets as @ElizabethWark7 The Covid pandemic has profoundly affected lives and livelihoods. This blog explains a family court...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Kirsty on An order for ‘no contact’ at West London Family Court
  • Julie Doughty on How do I make an application to the court to allow me to publish information about family proceedings?
  • terapan on How do I make an application to the court to allow me to publish information about family proceedings?
  • David Murray on Right of audience denied: McKenzie Friend not allowed to speak for litigant who was ‘well able to speak on her own behalf’
  • Julie Doughty on Will my Family Court judgment be published?

Search for something in particular

More search options

October 2025
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Sep    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok