info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Day 2 of the legal blogging pilot – Attending as a non-practising solicitor, under the umbrella of the Transparency Project

Day 2 of the legal blogging pilot – Attending as a non-practising solicitor, under the umbrella of the Transparency Project

by Alice T | Oct 2, 2018 | FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

On day two of the new legal blogging pilot I headed to the East London Family Court to check out how easy it would be to take up the new right to (normally) attend (most) family court hearings (just as an accredited journalist can). And to see what challenges it might...
Inaugural Legal Blogging Day

Inaugural Legal Blogging Day

by Lucy R | Oct 2, 2018 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

Yesterday, 1 October, was the first day of the new legal bloggers pilot. Having spent many hours persuading the powers that be that this was a good idea to try out, it seemed like the done thing to be there on Day One. So, shortly before 10am I trotted from Chambers...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Sep 29, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES The Daily Mail – Nurse’s one-year-old...
Legal Bloggers are go!

Legal Bloggers are go!

by reporting watch team | Sep 28, 2018 | FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

The legal blogging pilot starts on Monday. We have been thinking about how it might work and some of the issues that may arise. We have created a dedicated legal bloggers page, which provides information about the scheme and answers some likely queries. If you are a...
Is high quality journalism sustainable? Our evidence to the Cairncross Review

Is high quality journalism sustainable? Our evidence to the Cairncross Review

by Paul M | Sep 23, 2018 | Comment, Consultations, FCReportingWatch

The Cairncross review was set up by the government in March 2018 to investigate “how to sustain the production and distribution of high-quality journalism in a changing market”. It is chaired by Dame Frances Cairncross (a former journalist) and is...
The use of experts in family court cases involving children – guidance note

The use of experts in family court cases involving children – guidance note

by reporting watch team | Sep 19, 2018 | Guidance Note

We have written this guide for families and those working with and supporting them. You can view the online version or download a pdf (version 2 Jan 2019).
#CPConf2018: Risk of Future Emotional Harm – justified grounds to remove children?

#CPConf2018: Risk of Future Emotional Harm – justified grounds to remove children?

by Sarah P | Sep 19, 2018 | Transparency News

On 15th September a group of parents, lawyers, social workers and academics met at the Conway Hall in London for the third Child Protection Conference, supported by The Transparency Project and sponsored by Bath Publishing. There was an audio recording of the day...
14-year-old instructs his own solicitor in care proceedings

14-year-old instructs his own solicitor in care proceedings

by reporting watch team | Sep 18, 2018 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The Times published a story on 13 September under the headline, ‘Judge lets 14-year-old boy choose his own lawyer’. The judgment is on BAILII here – Re Z (A Child: Care Proceedings: Separate Representation)  [2018] EWFC B57. We don’t know why the Times has not...
Lord Chief Justice calls for more open justice

Lord Chief Justice calls for more open justice

by Paul M | Sep 13, 2018 | Comment, Transparency News

Judges should publish more judgments online, and they should engage more with the media, according to the Lord Chief Justice. “We cannot complain that the public does not understand what we do, and its importance, if we do not take steps to lift the veil a...

Correcting inaccuracy by the mainstream media in reporting of family court cases

by Lucy R | Sep 12, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

Family Law publishes a regular column by The Transparency Project. This blog post originally appeared in the August 2018 issue, [2018] Fam Law 1062. As we noted in our June column, ‘Press reporting on family courts’ [2018] Fam Law 750, there seems...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Hilary Searing on Sara Sharif -what we now know from the Safeguarding Review
  • Thoughtful on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Bayes on Trying to report the family courts – a BBC reporter’s experience
  • Diana Jordan on Repealing ‘the presumption” – an explainer
  • Sarah on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary

Search for something in particular

More search options

December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Nov    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.