info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
The President’s guidance for the Family Court on Covid 19

The President’s guidance for the Family Court on Covid 19

by reporting watch team | Mar 19, 2020 | FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

The President, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has issued the following national guidance and asked that it be shared widely: SIR ANDREW MCFARLANE  PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION AND HEAD OF FAMILY JUSTICE  COVID 19: National Guidance for the Family Court  19th...
How technology almost thwarted the family courts again (Z (A Child: committal proceeding))

How technology almost thwarted the family courts again (Z (A Child: committal proceeding))

by Malvika Jaganmohan | Mar 11, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

Z (A Child: committal proceeding) [2020] EWFC B5 (24 January 2020) concerned committal proceedings (i.e. proceedings about whether a party should be sent to prison) within a broader private law dispute between two parents over their child, ‘Z’.  Father...
‘The crisis in private law’ – by Sir James Munby

‘The crisis in private law’ – by Sir James Munby

by reporting watch team | Feb 10, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a talk by Sir James Munby (lately President of the Family Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales) at the Conference in Edinburgh on 10 February 2020 of Shared Parenting Scotland It is good of you to invite me to this important Conference....
‘Do Separating Parents Need the Family Court?’ – the annual Family Justice Council debate

‘Do Separating Parents Need the Family Court?’ – the annual Family Justice Council debate

by Alice T | Dec 6, 2019 | Analysis, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Update 1st October 2020 – The transcript and podcast are now available at the FJC website here: https://www.judiciary.uk/related-offices-and-bodies/advisory-bodies/fjc/conference-debates/debates/ Transparency Project members have attended the annual debates...
No take-backs? The parents who changed their mind about adoption and the local authority who got it very, very wrong

No take-backs? The parents who changed their mind about adoption and the local authority who got it very, very wrong

by Malvika Jaganmohan | Oct 14, 2019 | Cases, FCReportingWatch

Malvika Jaganmohan is a pupil barrister at Coram Chambers, a specialist family law chambers in London. She tweets as @MalvikaJaganmo1 All paragraph references in bold refer to the judgment which is publicly available on Bailii.  Background The case of Foster...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Andrew on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Julie Doughty on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Celia Kitzinger on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • anonymous on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Jennie on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks

Search for something in particular

More search options

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok