info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Desperately seeking guidance…

Desperately seeking guidance…

by reporting watch team | Apr 14, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

News reaches us of a document from the Lord Chief Justice, The President of the Family Division and The Master of the Rolls (a trio of ‘Top Judges’) that was circulated to Circuit and District Judges before the weekend, but which has now begun to be...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Apr 13, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to this month’s Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, explain and comment on published family court judgments and highlight other transparency news MEDIA COVERAGE OF FAMILY COURT MATTERS Many mainstream...
Coronacontact- what about the children in care?

Coronacontact- what about the children in care?

by Jack Harrison | Apr 11, 2020 | FCReportingWatch

In the past few weeks, life as we know it has changed beyond recognition. I was struck by the words of Mr Justice Hayden in BP v Surrey CC and RP [2020] EWCOP 17 : “It strikes me as redundant of any contrary argument that we are facing “a public emergency”...
Remote Justice: A legal blogger’s perspective

Remote Justice: A legal blogger’s perspective

by Lucy R | Apr 10, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Trends

On 8 April, I went to Stoke-on-Trent for the day. Of course, I didn’t physically go there, but I was able to ‘attend’ the Family Court there, by joining a series of five telephone hearings being handled over the course of a day by a District Judge. I attended using...
Remote Justice : A Judge’s perspective

Remote Justice : A Judge’s perspective

by Guest Post | Apr 7, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This guest post is written by an anonymous Circuit Judge working in the Family Court. There is no question that remote hearings are a good means of ensuring the continued delivery of the decision-making element of the family justice system.  It is amazing that we...
How are remote family court hearings working for families? Survey

How are remote family court hearings working for families? Survey

by Lucy R | Apr 7, 2020 | FCReportingWatch, Trends

Everyone in the family court is working hard to try and keep the show on the road at a time when we can’t hold face to face hearings. There has been a lot of information and feedback from judges and lawyers, but until we published an impactful blog post by Celia...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Courtney Cummings on Access to Family Court documents under the open justice principle
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • anon on Threshold Criteria
  • S on A failed reunification plan

Search for something in particular

More search options

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.