info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
An example of a family court judgment where the parties are named

An example of a family court judgment where the parties are named

by Lucy R | Oct 7, 2021 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

We’ve spotted an interesting decision from last month where a High Court Judge has published a judgment in connection with a jurisdictional dispute arising from a husband’s nullity petition, along with the names of both parties. The husband contended the...
I watched Eastenders and analysed Scarlett’s family court drama so you don’t have to

I watched Eastenders and analysed Scarlett’s family court drama so you don’t have to

by Malvika Jaganmohan | Oct 7, 2021 | Analysis, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

I confess, since Channel 5 cancelled Family Affairs, my commitment to British soaps has been sporadic at best. But once I heard that a juicy (and factually dubious) family court dispute was playing out on Eastenders involving glamorous villain, Janine Butcher, I...
Punished for telling the truth? Parental alienation and domestic abuse

Punished for telling the truth? Parental alienation and domestic abuse

by reporting watch team | Oct 4, 2021 | FCReportingWatch

Earlier this week we published a number of tweets on the topic of Parental Alienation. Firstly, there was a rash of published judgments on the topic (in which alienation was established), to which we tweeted links (see here and here). And secondly, we tweeted a link...
Why can’t we read Prince Philip’s Will?

Why can’t we read Prince Philip’s Will?

by Paul M | Sep 26, 2021 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The Royal Family in modern times live very public lives. Core members seem to have been bred in captivity, like exotic fish in an open aquarium, some of whose waters are murkier than others, but almost all of which will sooner or later be publicly visible. But not...
Non-resident parents and lack of engagement from the Child Maintenance Service and the Secretary of State

Non-resident parents and lack of engagement from the Child Maintenance Service and the Secretary of State

by Guest Post | Sep 23, 2021 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Kathryn Cassells. Kathryn is an associate solicitor at Vaitilingam Kay, specialising in family law including divorce, finances and private children law. Kathryn tweets as @MasonCassells Y v The Secretary of State for the Department of Work and...
Bell v Tavistock Court of Appeal Judgment: An Explainer

Bell v Tavistock Court of Appeal Judgment: An Explainer

by Emma Nottingham | Sep 19, 2021 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

On 17 September 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down the awaited judgment in the case of Bell v Tavistock. The full written case report can be found here. We reported on the Divisional court’s decision at the end of last year, and on the Court of Appeal hearing which...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Michael Freeman on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Jag Burns on Happy endings in East London Family Court – legal blogging under the extended Reporting Pilot
  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Courtney Cummings on Access to Family Court documents under the open justice principle

Search for something in particular

More search options

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.