info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Sharing (non)marital money: Sharp v Sharp

Sharing (non)marital money: Sharp v Sharp

by Polly Morgan | Jun 14, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

When a couple gets divorced, they must split their assets fairly, bearing in mind 3 principles set out by the Supreme Court in two joined cases, Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane. These 3 principles are: On divorce, each party’s needs must be met. Broadly,...
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children -v- Gard – further update

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children -v- Gard – further update

by Emma Nottingham | Jun 13, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

European Court delays case until Monday 19th June The Human Rights Court (European Court of Human Rights or ECHR) has stated that Charlie’s Gard’s life support must continue until midnight on Monday 19th June. The parents now have more time to put together a legal...
Complaint to The Telegraph (another one)

Complaint to The Telegraph (another one)

by reporting watch team | Jun 13, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Below is the text of a complaint submitted to The Telegraph today about Mr Booker’s reporting of H (A Child), Re (Interim Care Order : fact finding) [2017] EWHC 518 (Fam), which we don’t think is accurate. It is frustrating that we have to keep making such...
The Supreme Court Is Wrong on Charlie Gard and Withdrawal of Treatment

The Supreme Court Is Wrong on Charlie Gard and Withdrawal of Treatment

by Allan Norman | Jun 12, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

In the matter of Charlie Gard – Permission to appeal hearing [here]. [Other posts on our blog about this case can be found here] This is a case with intense poignancy. Charlie Gard is so seriously ill that it appears undisputed that he will never lead a full...
 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children -v- Gard – update

 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children -v- Gard – update

by Emma Nottingham | Jun 11, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Supreme Court decides that permission to appeal must be refused. Case being considered by Human Rights Court. Earlier posts about this case can be found here and here. The case concerned an eight-month-old child, Charlie Gard, who suffers from Mitochondrial Depletion...

Letter to the Editor of The Sunday Telegraph

by reporting watch team | Jun 10, 2017 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

We wrote to The Sunday Telegraph on 25 May. It doesn’t look as if they are going to publish our letter, so we thought we’d publish it here. You can read related posts here, here and here. dtletters@telegraph.co.uk, stletters@telegraph.co.uk 25 May 2017...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Charles Prest on Sir James Munby’s greatest hits: an appreciation of his work
  • Lucy Reed on Sending a mother to prison for contempt of court
  • Lucy Reed on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Lucy Reed on Children and parents speak up about the Pathfinder in private law – new research published
  • Coral Smith on Children and parents speak up about the Pathfinder in private law – new research published

Search for something in particular

More search options

January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Dec    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.