info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Making sense of parental alienation (Part 2)

Making sense of parental alienation (Part 2)

by reporting watch team | Dec 5, 2018 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch

In Part 1 of this blog post, we provided an update on policy and practice regarding issues of parental alienation. Re D [2018] EWFC B64 is a very lengthy (64 pages) fact-finding judgment by HHJ Clifford Bellamy in Chesterfield Family Court, delivered on 19...
The Sammy Woodhouse Story and Associated Campaigns – An Update

The Sammy Woodhouse Story and Associated Campaigns – An Update

by Lucy R | Dec 1, 2018 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

When we first posted on Tuesday about the Sammy Woodhouse story as it appeared in The Times (initially an anonymous story but swiftly identified as a story about Sammy and her son) the only real source of information was The Times itself (and a brief video posted on...
When should I apply for permission not to notify a father about a court case concerning his child?

When should I apply for permission not to notify a father about a court case concerning his child?

by reporting watch team | Nov 30, 2018 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Since the Sammy Woodhouse story first hit the news on Tuesday, the shape of the campaign she has launched for a change in the law relating to the rights of rapist fathers has gone through a number of changes. However, one early call was for guidance on the...
I’d have written that article too

I’d have written that article too

by Louise Tickle | Nov 28, 2018 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

This is a blog post by Louise Tickle, journalist member of The Transparency Project. It relates to yesterday’s Times article by Andrew Norfolk and the blog post from our chair Lucy Reed that we published yesterday in response, and in which we indicated that we...
Did a council ‘act perversely’ to offer a jailed rapist a chance to see his victim’s child?

Did a council ‘act perversely’ to offer a jailed rapist a chance to see his victim’s child?

by Lucy R | Nov 27, 2018 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Today sees another Andrew Norfolk front page article in The Times about the wrongs committed in the Family Court and by social services. Sadly, just like last time, this is a sensationalised headline and article which ignores some important facts and legal...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Nov 10, 2018 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES The Guardian – We questioned Families...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Sarah on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Rob on Government announces outcome of the review into the family court presumption of involvement of both parents in a child’s life
  • Kirsty on An order for ‘no contact’ at West London Family Court
  • Julie Doughty on How do I make an application to the court to allow me to publish information about family proceedings?
  • terapan on How do I make an application to the court to allow me to publish information about family proceedings?

Search for something in particular

More search options

October 2025
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Sep    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok