info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Cape v Dring and legal blogging

Cape v Dring and legal blogging

by Lucy R | Nov 23, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

This blog post originally appeared as the Transparency Project’s monthly column for October 2019 in Family Law [2019] Fam Law 1208(1). Cape v Dring In July 2019, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring...
Brothers’ and sisters’ rights in care

Brothers’ and sisters’ rights in care

by Julie Doughty | Nov 17, 2019 | Cases, FCReportingWatch

Many people believe that we do not pay enough attention to the rights of children in care to stay with, or at least stay in touch with, their brothers and sisters. Our relationships with our brothers and sisters can be the longest and most valuable in our lives but,...
‘Are you here because of the significant failure?’

‘Are you here because of the significant failure?’

by Lucy R | Nov 6, 2019 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

As it happens I wasn’t, and the lawyer who asked me this had assumed wrongly. I was attending court just to see what was on that day, and to use the legal blogging pilot to try to report a typical day in the life of a circuit judge. But I’d stumbled upon a...

Accuracy enthusiasts ban dodgy headlines – journalist blasts sub-editors for lie that made it around the world before the truth had got its boots on

by Louise Tickle | Oct 28, 2019 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

Last Wednesday, the Mail and the Sun published an article about a father who had just withdrawn from eight years of family court litigation. This man had been trying to re-establish his relationship with his children. His ex, the judge explained in a published...
New writers join the project team

New writers join the project team

by reporting watch team | Oct 23, 2019 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Project

This blog post originally appeared as our monthly column in the September 2019 issue of Family Law at [2019] Fam Law 1074(1). New writers join the project team In this month’s column, we feature some contributions by writers who have recently become involved in...
A new case on the ‘shaken baby’ problem

A new case on the ‘shaken baby’ problem

by Julie Doughty | Oct 20, 2019 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

TP and TS [2019] EWHC B51 concerns baby twins who had been born prematurely at 31 weeks and who subsequently experienced serious physical trauma that may have been attributable to their parents. The good news is that the court has arrived at a conclusion that the...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on Finding a journalist to attend your family court hearing
  • Anon on Finding a journalist to attend your family court hearing
  • Mom on Trauma in the Family Courts: the 2026 Family Law Breakfast
  • dad-victim on Frustrated: our attempts to report on family court hearing before Magistrates – a system in overload
  • Julie Doughty on Finding a journalist to attend your family court hearing

Search for something in particular

More search options

September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Aug    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 IPSO journalist judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions publication remotejustice reporting of family cases Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.