info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Domestic Abuse – revised guidance issued – what does it say?

Domestic Abuse – revised guidance issued – what does it say?

by reporting watch team | Sep 24, 2017 | Explanation, FCReportingWatch

Children at risk of psychogical or physical abuse must not have contact with parent, judges told (sic) This was the headline in The Times that arose from the publication by the President of the Family Division of a revised Practice Direction 12J (PD12J). PD12J is the...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Sep 17, 2017 | FCReportingWatch, Uncategorized

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news   MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES   John Hemming’s web log...
Should I apply for an Emergency Protection Order?

Should I apply for an Emergency Protection Order?

by reporting watch team | Sep 16, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

We’ve noticed that in a recent post the Researching Reform blog has highlighted the fact that it is possible for a parent to make an application for an Emergency Protection Order (EPO), an emergency order that is usually only made by social services to remove a...
Sinister, Secretive and Cruel – A Fair Characterisation?

Sinister, Secretive and Cruel – A Fair Characterisation?

by reporting watch team | Sep 11, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

Lara Prendergast wrote a piece in The Spectator last week that ran under this headline : The sinister power of Britain’s family courts – Even if decisions are obviously cruel and unjust, the public is often not allowed to know. It’s kicked off quite a...
Solicitors in a state of flux

Solicitors in a state of flux

by reporting watch team | Sep 10, 2017 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

This is a guest post by Mena Ruparel. Mena (@avoidgravity) is a solicitor and co-author of “How to be an ethical solicitor” published by Bath Publishing. On 31 August the Court of Appeal handed down the judgment in the big money case of Mr and Mrs Hart....
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on ASSISTED DYING: WHAT ROLE FOR THE PANEL? Thoughts on the latest (amended) proposals
  • Rufus badoofus on To name or not to name – that is the question
  • Liam on Cafcass new domestic abuse policy – an explainer
  • Bob on ‘Are you here because of the significant failure?’
  • Nick Radcliffe on National Psychology Service – Still in the dark

Search for something in particular

More search options

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok