info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Jan 7, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES The Sun (followed by the Mail) – In...
“Divorce Day”? Don’t believe the hype…

“Divorce Day”? Don’t believe the hype…

by reporting watch team | Jan 6, 2018 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Jo Edwards, who tweets as @MissJoEdwards. Like other fixtures in our diaries at this time of year – Boxing Day sales, gym and diet adverts starting just after Christmas, travel companies enticing us in the depths of winter with promises...
A fork in the road – Cafcass and their pathways

A fork in the road – Cafcass and their pathways

by reporting watch team | Jan 6, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

A little while ago we wrote some about Cafcass’ new proposed High Conflict pathway, which had been hailed in the press as a big thing in terms of dealing effectively with parental alienation. We had been offered an interview with the Cafcass Principal Social...
Celebrities are given a smidgen of privacy at a difficult time in their lives shocker

Celebrities are given a smidgen of privacy at a difficult time in their lives shocker

by reporting watch team | Jan 6, 2018 | Cases, FCReportingWatch

The Sun are very very cross. Why is that? Well…. Here’s the headline : REDKNAPP DIVORCE SECRET Jamie and Louise Redknapp’s divorce papers to be kept secret as a judge blocks the release of documents District Judge Ian Paul Mulkis blocked the release of...
We’re recharging our batteries! Back in 2018

We’re recharging our batteries! Back in 2018

by reporting watch team | Dec 22, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

Merry Christmas from The Transparency Project team. We’ve been a bit quiet the last few weeks, but will be back with a spring in our step in 2018. By the way, the picture is of The Tate gallery, snapped by Paul Magrath as he went by. We thought it was a good...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on ASSISTED DYING: WHAT ROLE FOR THE PANEL? Thoughts on the latest (amended) proposals
  • Rufus badoofus on To name or not to name – that is the question
  • Liam on Cafcass new domestic abuse policy – an explainer
  • Bob on ‘Are you here because of the significant failure?’
  • Nick Radcliffe on National Psychology Service – Still in the dark

Search for something in particular

More search options

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok