info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Can parents publicly petition against care orders?

Can parents publicly petition against care orders?

by Julie Doughty | Aug 13, 2017 | Cases, Comment, Explanation

The answer to the question is yes, in very limited circumstances and where no harm can be shown as likely to the children. In Southend Borough Council v CO and DW [2017] EWHC 1949 (Fam), reported on BAILII last month, the High Court judge decided not to order parents...
Court of Protection announcement on holding its hearings in public

Court of Protection announcement on holding its hearings in public

by Julie Doughty | Jul 4, 2017 | Comment, Court of Protection, Transparency News, Trends

With many thanks to Barbara Rich for explaining what this all means for people involved in CoP cases. Context and background When the Court of Protection was established in its present form in 2007, the relevant court rules were written to cover two separate...
Judge flags complaint on behalf of child against journalist who sneaked into hospital

Judge flags complaint on behalf of child against journalist who sneaked into hospital

by Julie Doughty | May 25, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

A new judgment by Mr Justice Hayden, in the case of ‘H’, the 15 year old boy at the centre of the Telegraph story we reported on here, was published yesterday. The hearing took place on 19 May. Hayden J concludes his short judgment with this: ‘Whilst I am satisfied...
Is there any public interest in naming divorcing couples?

Is there any public interest in naming divorcing couples?

by Julie Doughty | May 17, 2017 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

In The Times last week, family courts were accused of being ‘secretive’ because they do not advertise the names of people who are getting divorced – under the headline ‘Call to end divorce case secrecy’ (paywall). ‘Secret’...
‘Gross and obvious irregularity’ by a family court judge – LL v the Lord Chancellor

‘Gross and obvious irregularity’ by a family court judge – LL v the Lord Chancellor

by Julie Doughty | Apr 12, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

An unusual case from the Court of Appeal was published on BAILII this week, LL v the Lord Chancellor [2017 EWCA Civ 237, in which a High Court judge was criticised for ‘gross and obvious irregularity’ in dealing with a father in a family hearing and, as a...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on ASSISTED DYING: WHAT ROLE FOR THE PANEL? Thoughts on the latest (amended) proposals
  • Julia on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks
  • Lucy on Mums on the run
  • Julie Doughty on Does a reporter have to be in court to read confidential documents?
  • Social Work Observer on Do social workers have a duty of care to protect children of local authority tenants?

Search for something in particular

More search options

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok