info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Civil Justice Council Rapid Consultation: The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system

Civil Justice Council Rapid Consultation: The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system

by Paul M | May 19, 2020 | Consultations, Transparency News, Trends

Following the rapid consultation on the use of remote hearings in the family justice system, undertaken by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory at the request of the President of the Family Division, the Civil Justice Council have now embarked on a similar...
The latest remote hearing decision : “Not without my lawyer!”

The latest remote hearing decision : “Not without my lawyer!”

by Guest Post | May 19, 2020 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This is a post by Delia Minoprio. Delia is a family law barrister at 1 Crown Office Row specialising in all aspects of children work. She tweets as @familylawdm The latest case on remote hearings in a care case comes from Mr Justice Williams,...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by Alice T | May 16, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Court of Protection, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to this month’s Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, explain and comment on published family court judgments and highlight other transparency news MEDIA COVERAGE OF FAMILY COURT MATTERS The Times and the...
Small update from the President on his Transparency Review call for evidence

Small update from the President on his Transparency Review call for evidence

by Alice T | May 16, 2020 | FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

This is a quick post to share some helpful updating information from the President. We think only those who responded to the Transparency Review call for evidence will have received this email update. So for those who don’t already know, the President has now...
To name or not to name – that is the question

To name or not to name – that is the question

by Lucy R | May 12, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

We noticed two cases in which judgments were published yesterday, the very day that the President’s Transparency Review call for evidence closed – each deals with the question of whether a local authority who had brought care proceedings should be named, and...
Transparency Review Call For Evidence Closes – Our Response

Transparency Review Call For Evidence Closes – Our Response

by Lucy R | May 11, 2020 | Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

The President of the Family Division’s Transparency Review Panel put out a call for evidence in the early months of the year, before Covid-19 darkened our doors. Today the several-times-extended deadline for that call for evidence fell due. The Transparency...
Is Criminal Justice Under Lockdown Remotely Possible?

Is Criminal Justice Under Lockdown Remotely Possible?

by Paul M | May 11, 2020 | Comment, Transparency News, Trends

Justice suspended Nothing better represents our idea of justice being not only done but seen to be done than the spectacle of trial by jury in the Crown Court.  The arrangement of the physical space of the courtroom, the royal coat of arms behind the raised bench...
Transgender man loses appeal and remains recognised as ‘mother’ on child’s birth certificate

Transgender man loses appeal and remains recognised as ‘mother’ on child’s birth certificate

by Emma Nottingham | May 10, 2020 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This case concerns an appeal by Alfred McConnell (previously anonymised as TT in the first instance decision). Mr McConnell was born female but around 10 years ago, at the age of 22, transitioned to become male, undergoing testosterone treatment and a double...
The magic soup stone strikes again (more new authorities about remote hearings)

The magic soup stone strikes again (more new authorities about remote hearings)

by Lucy R | May 7, 2020 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

Following on from our Alphabet Soup post about Re A and Re B (and our earlier post about Re P), there are two new remote hearing related judgments out : A Local Authority v Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1086 (Fam) and Re Q [2020] EWHC 1109 (Fam). As with A and B,...
The future of journalism: our response to the inquiry

The future of journalism: our response to the inquiry

by Paul M | May 6, 2020 | Consultations, Trends

The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee is currently holding an inquiry into the future of journalism. “This inquiry will investigate how digital technologies are changing the production and consumption of journalism, how journalists can be...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Celia Kitzinger on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • anonymous on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Jennie on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks
  • DAVID EGGINS on Where’s me DAPPs? (the end of perpetrators’ programmes)

Search for something in particular

More search options

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok