info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
P (A Child: Remote Hearing) (Rev 3) [2020] EWFC 32: When is remote justice not justice?

P (A Child: Remote Hearing) (Rev 3) [2020] EWFC 32: When is remote justice not justice?

by Jack Harrison | Apr 23, 2020 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

Re P (A Child: Remote Hearing) (Rev 3) [2020] EWFC 32 is a decision of the President of the Family Division and Head of Family Justice, Sir Andrew McFarlane, about whether or not a 15 day trial should go ahead remotely. The trial was set down within care proceedings...

Transparency Project News February 2020

by reporting watch team | Apr 19, 2020 | FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

This blog post originally appeared as the Transparency Project’s monthly column in Family Law for February 2020 at Family [2020] Fam Law 265. Transparency Templates The President has published some new ‘Transparency Templates’, which are draft orders for...
Socially distanced courts for the digitally excluded

Socially distanced courts for the digitally excluded

by Paul M | Apr 19, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

We have heard a lot about how the courts are responding to the coronavirus pandemic by conducting hearings online instead of in a physical court room. But while hearings by Skype and Zoom enable participants to maintain social distancing and avoid the risks of...
Desperately seeking guidance…

Desperately seeking guidance…

by reporting watch team | Apr 14, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

News reaches us of a document from the Lord Chief Justice, The President of the Family Division and The Master of the Rolls (a trio of ‘Top Judges’) that was circulated to Circuit and District Judges before the weekend, but which has now begun to be...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Apr 13, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to this month’s Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, explain and comment on published family court judgments and highlight other transparency news MEDIA COVERAGE OF FAMILY COURT MATTERS Many mainstream...
Coronacontact- what about the children in care?

Coronacontact- what about the children in care?

by Jack Harrison | Apr 11, 2020 | FCReportingWatch

In the past few weeks, life as we know it has changed beyond recognition. I was struck by the words of Mr Justice Hayden in BP v Surrey CC and RP [2020] EWCOP 17 : “It strikes me as redundant of any contrary argument that we are facing “a public emergency”...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Charles Prest on Sir James Munby’s greatest hits: an appreciation of his work
  • Lucy Reed on Sending a mother to prison for contempt of court
  • Lucy Reed on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Lucy Reed on Children and parents speak up about the Pathfinder in private law – new research published
  • Coral Smith on Children and parents speak up about the Pathfinder in private law – new research published

Search for something in particular

More search options

February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
« Jan    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.