info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Open Justice Inquiry – Read the written evidence

Open Justice Inquiry – Read the written evidence

by reporting watch team | Nov 27, 2021 | Comment, Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

The Justice Committee is currently conducting an inquiry : Open justice: court reporting in the digital age The inquiry is not specific to family justice but it does encompass issues of relevance to the Family Court – so we made written submissions. One of our...
Financial Remedies Transparency Proposals – Our Response

Financial Remedies Transparency Proposals – Our Response

by reporting watch team | Nov 27, 2021 | Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

Alongside the main Transparency Review report, the lead judges of the Financial Remedies Court also published a consultation last month seeking views on a proposed ‘reporting permission order’ that is envisaged for regulating access to and use of documents...
MORE TRANSPARENCY IN THE FINANCIAL REMEDIES COURT

MORE TRANSPARENCY IN THE FINANCIAL REMEDIES COURT

by Guest Post | Nov 16, 2021 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

This is a guest post from Sir James Munby. Sir James is the previous President of the Family Division. Hard on the heels of the CONSULTATION ON A PROPOSAL FOR A STANDARD REPORTING PERMISSION ORDER IN FINANCIAL REMEDY PROCEEDINGS published by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess, the...
Seeing invisible elephants – the transparency review is published

Seeing invisible elephants – the transparency review is published

by Lucy R | Oct 29, 2021 | Comment, Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

The President’s Transparency Review has finally concluded. After a period long enough to gestate both an elephant and a human baby consecutively, was it worth the wait? Our response is an emphatic ‘Yes’. The president has both acknowledged the massive, weighty,...
The Harm Report – one year on

The Harm Report – one year on

by reporting watch team | Jul 3, 2021 | Consultations, Events, FCReportingWatch

June 2021 sees the first anniversary of publication of the report ‘Assessing risk of harm to children and parents in private law children cases’ (the Harm report). We have published a number of posts about the report. The UK government responded to the...
Munby 2.0 – Revised version of Sir James’ Submissions to the Transparency Review

Munby 2.0 – Revised version of Sir James’ Submissions to the Transparency Review

by reporting watch team | May 16, 2021 | Comment, Consultations, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

This is the REVISED text of a submission to the President of the Family Division’s Transparency Review made by Sir James Munby (former President of the Family Division), in advance of the oral evidence session scheduled for 17 May 2021. It is published here with kind...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Michael Freeman on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Jag Burns on Happy endings in East London Family Court – legal blogging under the extended Reporting Pilot
  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Courtney Cummings on Access to Family Court documents under the open justice principle

Search for something in particular

More search options

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.