info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
The Family Court : Should privacy trump accountability? What do you think?

The Family Court : Should privacy trump accountability? What do you think?

by reporting watch team | Oct 28, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

The Transparency Project will be hosting a debate on 5 December in Bristol at 6pm at The Station, to mark the publication of our Guidance Note for families and professionals : Publication of Family Court Judgments. The debate will be chaired by His Honour Judge...
Covert Recording : A hot potato lob by the Court of Appeal

Covert Recording : A hot potato lob by the Court of Appeal

by reporting watch team | Oct 24, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The Court of Appeal delivered judgment in Re B (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1579 last week. In it they consider (but do not resolve) the question of how the Family Court should deal with evidence obtained by covert recording. Whilst it took the Court of Appeal almost a...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Oct 22, 2017 | FCReportingWatch, Uncategorized

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES “A very provocative broadside” – are women...
“A very provocative broadside” – are women really destroying marriage?

“A very provocative broadside” – are women really destroying marriage?

by reporting watch team | Oct 22, 2017 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Jo Edwards. Jo is a partner and Head of Family at Forsters solicitors and former Chair of Resolution. She tweets as @MissJoEdwards. “Women are destroying marriage!” screamed a line that caught my eye on Twitter this week. As I...
Trying to report the family courts – a BBC reporter’s experience

Trying to report the family courts – a BBC reporter’s experience

by reporting watch team | Oct 17, 2017 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Sanchia Berg. Sanchia is a BBC Reporter and tweets as @sanchia7.   “Go down and see what you can get” was the commission from the then Today Editor Ceri Thomas. It was April 27 2009, the first day English Family Courts were...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Diana Jordan on Repealing ‘the presumption” – an explainer
  • Sarah on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Rob on Government announces outcome of the review into the family court presumption of involvement of both parents in a child’s life
  • Kirsty on An order for ‘no contact’ at West London Family Court
  • Julie Doughty on How do I make an application to the court to allow me to publish information about family proceedings?

Search for something in particular

More search options

November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Oct    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok