info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
One small step at a time – from pilot to practice direction

One small step at a time – from pilot to practice direction

by reporting watch team | Dec 20, 2024 | Legal blogging, Reporting Pilot, Transparency News

Santa has brought a whole sackful of transparency related goodies for us to report on. The stocking fillers are The Transparency and Open Justice Board’s call for views on its proposed Key Objectives (yes, this is the board announced some months ago, but...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Dec 6, 2024 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to the Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family law, explain and comment on published family court judgments, and highlight other transparency news.

Law reform and contempt of court – but where are family courts?

Law reform and contempt of court – but where are family courts?

by reporting watch team | Dec 5, 2024 | Comment, Consultations

The Law Commission for England and Wales is consulting on proposals to reform the law of contempt of court. The consultation paper is more than 400 pages long but there’s a handy summary on the web page. As most readers of this blog are only too well aware, a...
Air Conditioning, Astroturf, and Transparency Orders

Air Conditioning, Astroturf, and Transparency Orders

by Guest Post | Aug 13, 2024 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

This is a guest post from Anna Yarde. Anna is a barrister at Harcourt Chambers. Lauryn Goodman v Kyle Andrew Walker [2024] EWFC 212 (B) This is a case about an influencer, a famous footballer, infidelity and lavish spending. It is also a case about transparency and...
Frustrated: our attempts to report on family court hearing before Magistrates – a system in overload

Frustrated: our attempts to report on family court hearing before Magistrates – a system in overload

by reporting watch team | Aug 1, 2024 | FCReportingWatch, Reporting Pilot, Transparency News

If we can’t navigate the system what hope for litigants in person? POST UPDATED 24 SEPTEMBER 2024 As far as we know legal bloggers at The Transparency Project are the only reporters who have tried to report on family court cases being dealt with by magistrates....
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Andrew on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Julie Doughty on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Celia Kitzinger on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • anonymous on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Jennie on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks

Search for something in particular

More search options

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok