info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Separating the divorce from the money bit

Separating the divorce from the money bit

by reporting watch team | May 21, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

When married couples and civil partners separate there are two (or three) parts to the legal arrangements : getting divorced (called dissolution if you are in a civil partnership), sorting out the money, and sorting out arrangements for any children. The way the law...
Is there any public interest in naming divorcing couples?

Is there any public interest in naming divorcing couples?

by Julie Doughty | May 17, 2017 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

In The Times last week, family courts were accused of being ‘secretive’ because they do not advertise the names of people who are getting divorced – under the headline ‘Call to end divorce case secrecy’ (paywall). ‘Secret’...

Good Work Mr Work – but is it GENIUS Work? Nope.

by reporting watch team | Apr 14, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

The case of Work v Gray has been in the news this week, as the Court of Appeal dealt with Mr Work’s attempt to overturn a decision that his wife should get a half share of their fortune. We wrote about it in January here : A genius from another planet? This post...
“Setting a precedent” – what does it actually mean?

“Setting a precedent” – what does it actually mean?

by reporting watch team | Mar 6, 2017 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

On 27 February 2017 The Telegraph reported on an ongoing appeal in the Court of Appeal by a wealthy wife (Mrs Sharp) in respect of the financial order made following her divorce. Millionaire wife challenges divorce settlement which gave ex-husband half of £5.45m...
Mrs Norman and the indigestible cherry

Mrs Norman and the indigestible cherry

by reporting watch team | Mar 5, 2017 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Update : the main judgment in the case of Norman has now been published. You can read it here : Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 120 (03 March 2017) We’ve previously written about this case when it was covered in the press, and when an earlier judgment was released in...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Jeffrey Baker, ISW on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Robert Sharp on A family damaged by court proceedings?

Search for something in particular

More search options

October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Sep    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child arrangements child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.