-
Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases
-
Explaining or commenting on published judgments of family court cases
-
Highlighting other transparency news
MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES
The Daily Mail – Nurse’s one-year-old son is taken from her care after she let him sit in a Bob The Builder toy car that was ‘inappropriate’ for his age. The Mail rejected our complaint about this headline and we decided to take the matter to the regulator, IPSO. We’ve now heard back from IPSO and have sent in a further response. We’ll comment further when we can (when the decision is published):
How effective is press regulation when it comes to accuracy? Putting the finishing touches to our complaint to @IpsoNews about @DailyMailUK : https://t.co/TvpzSOgEW9 pic.twitter.com/upNC8uK443
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) June 24, 2018
Transparency Positive
Comments of Mrs Justice Gwynneth Knowles usefully reminded that it’s important for council competence to be made transparent through publication of family court judgments (where warranted) as well as failures. See paragraph 67 of A Local Authority v A Mother and others. (See also this twitter thread discussion on why we publish judgments):
'Local authorites often find themselves the butt of judicial criticism but [with 1 exception] this LA has acted impeccably in its conduct of this unusual & difficult case. (p67)'Good to see council competence made transparent in publication of judgments where warranted too. https://t.co/qe502i6l4F
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 28, 2018
Linkless
The Daily Mail (via the Press Association); BBC News; Care Appointments; The Times – Mail Online reported the judgments from fact finding and welfare decisions in High Court care proceedings without linking readers to them. BBC News (local) reported Bristol City Council reversing cuts to SEN/ Disabilities for young people after a judicial review claim with no link to the published judgment. Care Appointments reported the published judgment from a care proceedings decision (critical of an unnamed council and the court), without linking readers to that judgment; The Times reported this care proceedings decision without a link to the judgment:
The source of this @MailOnline report is here by the way: https://t.co/Sok1PenHMu
In the form of 2 anonymised judgments freely available online @BAILII. https://t.co/dtPSon7PgN via @MailOnline— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 28, 2018
Judgment here for anyone who wants to read it : https://t.co/bcTJQNcZhD – @BBCNews could you please add this link to your item?
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 21, 2018
Would you please add a link for readers to the free published anonymised judgment @BAILII you based this report on @CareApps ? @PA : https://t.co/SUyNJ8Mn7r https://t.co/xUINc3Nunb
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 29, 2018
Linker of the week
We’ve seen no mainstream news publisher link readers from their report of a family court decision to the online judgment for weeks.
NEWLY PUBLISHED CASES FOR EXPLANATION OR COMMENT
Re Z (A Child: Care Proceedings: Separate Representation) 2018 – We explained the judgment from this decision in 14-year-old instructs his own solicitor in care proceedings. See Separate representation of a child: A thorny problem from SuespiciousMinds and A child’s understanding to instruct a solicitor direct from DB Family Law for further analysis:
new from @seethrujustice good example of a family court judgment focused on rights of 14 yr old boy in care proceedings https://t.co/lrVTHOUl2h cc @CRJudgments
— Dr Julie Doughty (@julie_doughty) September 19, 2018
IN OTHER TRANSPARENCY NEWS
The new legal bloggers pilot – Similar access for legal bloggers to the family courts as for accredited journalists starts under pilot on Monday. See Legal Bloggers are go! See also our dedicated legal bloggers page for information and key documents that will be useful for any lawyer who wants to attend under the pilot, attend under the Transparency Project umbrella, blog about it at @seethrujustice, or contribute to efforts to evaluate the pilot:
Legal Bloggers are go! (Well, they will be on Monday). Find out more here https://t.co/bRSTIK33BW and on our dedicated legal bloggers page… pic.twitter.com/AmvXRHP765
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 28, 2018
The Cairncross Review of sustainable journalism – The Transparency Project responded. See Is high quality journalism sustainable? Our evidence to the Cairncross Review with links to our response and some other responses to the review:
Is high quality journalism sustainable? Our evidence to the Cairncross Review [and links to some other submitted responses] by @Maggotlaw for @seethrujustice : https://t.co/DxP0Qy8K0t pic.twitter.com/iNHklET4RF
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 24, 2018
Child Protection Conference 2018 – The write up is here with links to most of the presentations and the new Transparency Project Guidance Note on Experts launched at the conference:
Summary of the day #CPConf2018 and links to speakers' presentations. We need to do more – to explain what 'emotional harm' means and how we identify its future risk. We also need to engage with the ethical question. Not 'can we'? But SHOULD we? https://t.co/G5OqlAPkwB pic.twitter.com/7lCZqMEymp
— transparency project (@seethrujustice) September 19, 2018
Excellent accessible guidance note on use of experts in child and family cases. Would be good to include guidance from @BPSOfficial & FJC on psychologists as expert witnesses https://t.co/Z8PW0t4Scg alongside the guidance from @rcpsych & FJC https://t.co/sutnKFAWIi
— Dr Sue Whitcombe (@drsue2014) September 20, 2018
The Open Family Court project – Louise Tickle (freelance journalist and TP member) announced next steps for the Open Family Court. See the blog post New Call for Openness for how to get in touch to blog for the project or attend a multi disciplinary workshop or tweet at @openfamilycourt:
Anyone who'd like to be involved in my Open Family Court project looking at how we might re-balance free speech and privacy in family law proceedings, please read my first blogpost (link below) and get in touch. Am compiling email groups and planning workshops this week! https://t.co/kXKrhXszVS
— The open family court (@openfamilycourt) September 24, 2018
Bar Council Legal Reporting Awards – The 2018 awards launched in recognition of the media’s role in promoting better understanding of the law in the context of public interest law and justice issues. Open to print/online and broadcast journalists (blogs excluded). Details here:
Calling all journalists: The Bar Council's annual Legal Reporting Awards is now open for nominations. £1000 prize up for grabs https://t.co/3vcIZK2ahP pic.twitter.com/TWqS0YiAfM
— The Bar Council (@thebarcouncil) September 24, 2018
Feature pic: Courtesy of Flickr Lauri Heikkinen via Creative Commons licence – with thanks