info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
On Her Majesty’s Secret [Court] Service, or ‘Billionaire Putin crony loses right to secrecy in Britain’

On Her Majesty’s Secret [Court] Service, or ‘Billionaire Putin crony loses right to secrecy in Britain’

by Paul M | Feb 25, 2018 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

“Secrecy in the court system is a growing concern. The press has a duty to uphold the principle of open justice and act as the eyes and ears of the public in the courts. The Times will resist any attempts to erode those principles.” So concludes a front page story in...
Fact Finding hearings and criminal law

Fact Finding hearings and criminal law

by reporting watch team | Feb 18, 2018 | Cases, FCReportingWatch

This post is about a new judgment from the Court of Appeal called : R (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 198 (16 February 2018). It is about what approach the family court should take in deciding the background facts to a case where a crime might have been committed, and how...
Things children say – Disclosure, allegations and why language matters

Things children say – Disclosure, allegations and why language matters

by reporting watch team | Feb 15, 2018 | Comment, FCReportingWatch

Earlier this month the NSPCC put out a call on twitter for professionals to respond to a survey they are running as part of the evidence gathering phase of ‘a project to support professionals to take the appropriate action when they have concerns about the...
Cafcass ‘tool up’ for children’s voices

Cafcass ‘tool up’ for children’s voices

by reporting watch team | Feb 14, 2018 | FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

  ‘Voice of the Child: How to help children’s voices be heard loud and clear throughout the family court process’: This was the title of an Open Board Meeting at Cafcass we attended recently. (Cafcass transparently hold two ‘open’ board...

Privacy versus Accountability in the Family Courts

by Lucy R | Feb 12, 2018 | Events, FCReportingWatch

Family Law publishes a regular column by The Transparency Project. This blog post originally appeared in the February 2018 issue,[2018] Fam Law 222. On 5 December 2017, The Transparency Project hosted a debate about privacy and accountability in the family courts, in...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Feb 11, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES The Daily Mail – We questioned whether...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Melia E Welch on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Julie Doughty on Care order or Supervision Order?
  • Julie Doughty on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • anon on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair

Search for something in particular

More search options

June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.