info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Why did Gloucestershire seek anonymity?

Why did Gloucestershire seek anonymity?

by reporting watch team | Nov 11, 2017 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

We’ve recently covered a case where a grandmother was permitted by a family court judge to tell of her experience in trying to secure the care of her baby granddaughter from Gloucestershire Council. After conceding that the grandmother ought to be able to tell...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Oct 29, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES The Express – On Monday the Express...
The Family Court : Should privacy trump accountability? What do you think?

The Family Court : Should privacy trump accountability? What do you think?

by reporting watch team | Oct 28, 2017 | FCReportingWatch

The Transparency Project will be hosting a debate on 5 December in Bristol at 6pm at The Station, to mark the publication of our Guidance Note for families and professionals : Publication of Family Court Judgments. The debate will be chaired by His Honour Judge...
Covert Recording : A hot potato lob by the Court of Appeal

Covert Recording : A hot potato lob by the Court of Appeal

by reporting watch team | Oct 24, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

The Court of Appeal delivered judgment in Re B (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1579 last week. In it they consider (but do not resolve) the question of how the Family Court should deal with evidence obtained by covert recording. Whilst it took the Court of Appeal almost a...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Oct 22, 2017 | FCReportingWatch, Uncategorized

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURT CASES “A very provocative broadside” – are women...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Julie Doughty on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Michael Freeman on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Jag Burns on Happy endings in East London Family Court – legal blogging under the extended Reporting Pilot
  • John simmonds on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Courtney Cummings on Access to Family Court documents under the open justice principle

Search for something in particular

More search options

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.