info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Bell v Tavistock in the High Court: an explainer

Bell v Tavistock in the High Court: an explainer

by reporting watch team | Dec 9, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Last week, the High Court handed down the judgment in the highly publicised case of Bell v Tavistock (R (Quincy Bell) and A  v Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, and others [2020] EWHC 3274).  In this blog post, compiled by several members of the TP team, we...
The view lengthens…

The view lengthens…

by reporting watch team | Nov 25, 2020 | FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging, Transparency News

Last week saw the publication of the latest ‘View from the President’s Chambers’ (a label adopted by the current President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, but coined by his predecessor Sir James Munby to describe his regular...
What is the evidence that mediation works in child protection?

What is the evidence that mediation works in child protection?

by reporting watch team | Nov 18, 2020 | Comment, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

The Nuffield Family Justice Observatory have just published the findings of a rapid evidence review on child protection mediation, in the form of a summary and full report:  Both the Family Justice Review led by David Norgrove back in 2011 and the Care...
Lockdown 2 and contact – what are the rules?

Lockdown 2 and contact – what are the rules?

by reporting watch team | Nov 4, 2020 | FCReportingWatch

This is a short post to set out the impact that the Regulations coming into force at midnight at the start of Lockdown 2 will have on contact between parents and child. The regulations and this post apply to England only. General During lockdown 2 it will be unlawful...
Remote hearings: Surveying where we are at

Remote hearings: Surveying where we are at

by reporting watch team | Sep 24, 2020 | Consultations, FCReportingWatch

As lawyers and judges become increasingly accustomed to remote hearings, is there a danger of professional complacency about parents’ access to justice? In April, we published the interim results of our survey about remote hearings in the Family Court which we...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Andrew on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Julie Doughty on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • Celia Kitzinger on Can a court make a journalist reveal their source of information about a family court hearing?
  • anonymous on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Jennie on Completing care proceedings in less than 26 weeks

Search for something in particular

More search options

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass child protection committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok