info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page

Transparency Project News: The President’s Guidance – three years later

by Lucy R | Jan 3, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

‘Family Law’ publishes a regular blog series by The Transparency Project. This post originally appeared in July 2017 at [2017] Fam Law 778. It is reproduced here with kind permission of the publisher. It is now nearly 3 years since Sir James Munby,...
Who pays for the harm done to children? CN v Poole and the law of negligence

Who pays for the harm done to children? CN v Poole and the law of negligence

by Sarah P | Jan 3, 2018 | Explanation, FCReportingWatch

On December 21st 2017, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in CN v Poole Borough Council  [2017] EWCA civ 2185. This judgment prompted a report in The Times on the 1st January 2018 with the headline ‘Abuse victims told they can’t sue council for...

Transparency Project News: Correction requests and complaints

by Lucy R | Jan 3, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

‘Family Law’ publishes a regular blog series by The Transparency Project. This post originally appeared in June 2017 at [2017] Fam Law 694 and is reproduced here with kind permission of the publishers. As well as writing up and commenting on specific...

Transparency Project News: Reporting family courts

by Lucy R | Jan 3, 2018 | FCReportingWatch

‘Family Law’ publishes a regular blog series by The Transparency Project. This post originally appeared in May 2017 at [2017] Fam Law 564. It is reproduced here with kind permission of the publisher. On 5 April 2017 The Transparency Project held a panel...

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Melia E Welch on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Julie Doughty on Care order or Supervision Order?
  • Julie Doughty on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • anon on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair

Search for something in particular

More search options

January 2018
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec   Feb »
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.