Cafcass hold two board meetings in public each year to promote transparency, engagement and trust. They normally alternate between topic based and ordinary working board meetings held in public. This time they held back their open meeting to Wednesday 9th October, in order to involve (and unveil) newly appointed Chief Executive Officer, Jacky Tiotto, after a long period of interim governance.
The minutes of that open board meeting will be published here by February 2020. In the meantime we flag a few points of potential interest for those not able to attend.
Early impressions and priorities from the new CEO
Jacky Tiotto offered early impressions and emerging priorities based on her first 6 weeks in post, and in the context of the newly published Cafcass strategy for the next four years.
Among the priorities she identified as pressing were:
- A need for some form of demand reduction / gate-keeping in the face of continuing rises in volume of private law referrals (and in the complexity of public law referrals despite a slight drop off in volume). Time for a Cafcass Threshold Document for private law cases ?
- Getting the Family Forum up and running in an effort to be genuinely influenced by the experiences of all users, including those who say Cafcass didn’t get it right for them. Tiotto referenced a fast moving trend towards family lead initiatives such as in Camden; the fact that children are generally located within families such that hearing the adults directly co relates to their experiences; and a potential family forum membership role for organisations as well as individuals.
- A national leadership role for Cafcass, beyond the implementation of reforms from the public and private law consultations (Cafcass responses to those consultations here) to the sort of systemic, framing questions Tiotto thinks need answers at national, cross-departmental level: What should family life in this country in 2019 look like? When should the state be interfering? What sort of systems wide solutions are required to get beyond a reactive demand lead system? Tioto suggested radical reforms beyond those currently on the reform agenda are probably required.
Watch out also for:
- Closer collaboration with local authorities including possible task sharing, in an apparent pragmatic, resource-lead shift from previous unqualified assumptions about the need for separation of Cafcass from local authorities. [Inevitably raising questions about whether and how appropriate safeguards will be built in.]
- Conversations are also already underway with Frontline on social work recruitment for Cafcass (without undermining local authority recruitment capacity).
- A continued focus on making better use of Cafcass data at local partnership and systems leadership levels. Including to inform understanding of regional variations in care proceedings numbers.
- A commitment to greater transparency of working, not just with partner agencies but with the families Cafcass serve and the wider community. The new strategy 2019-2023 features an aspiration for “a more transparent service so that children and families understand what will happen at each stage of their case” Alongside a goal of enhanced capacity to show the rationale behind individual decisions made. And a commitment to understanding the difference Cafcass involvement can make so as to improve the service.
Transparency
Cafcass remain the only part of the family justice system consistently holding board meetings in public, so far as we know. They’ve done it for several years now. They also consistently publish the minutes of their meetings. The Family Justice Council have held open meetings but don’t appear to have maintained the initiative. The Family Procedure Rule Committee hold occasional open meetings (and have now published minutes outstanding since November 2018).
The Cafcass open board meetings are a welcome contribution to transparency, both as a model and in themselves. The next is due to take place on 22nd January 2020. We imagine it is likely to be topic based. Members of the public can attend if successfully registering ahead.
Only time, and children’s lives will tell…..
[BTW 22nd January 2020 I presume you meant to put?]
yes 2020! Amended thanks.
I shall very much look forward to attending this.
Dear Lucy ,
You do not have to publish this if you wish but it’s now come to light that since rollout of the new framework there is a serious systemic mal failure
The FCA undertake FOR 22Evidence and controls it to include listening to recordings/ analysing them but copies not shared to parties nor submitted to court nor directions made for court.
The FCA undertakes finding of facts
CAFCASS gather witness statements and file by email to court. Witness statements are not supplied to all parties.
CAFCASS are now saying under GDPR they can’t supply copies of witness statements they gather because ‘it’s not their personal data’ so the parties have no sight of evidence in witness statements against them.
GDPR surely can not be used fir CAFCASS to with hold witness statements as FPR allow for them to be supplied to all parties.
If Family Procedure rules are now that CAFCASS control evidence as I outline are the new rules going to be Transparent to the public.
For 9 months I’ve been on a merry go round where CAFCASS say the court are to provide sight of witness statements and The court saying they can’t and CAFCASS have to provide them going round in circles but no provision of witness statements.
Surely FPR are still withstanding in that all parties are supplied copies.
If this is a pilot taking place it needs to be made transparent as there is a conflict and systemic glitch between GDPR not allowing parties in proceedings sight of witness statements and FPR saying they are to be provided copies.
This is a deeply divisive operating process and very unclear.
HMCTS wrote and said it was a matter for CAFCASS after looking at it carefully but they came straight back in an email stating GDPR regulations means they can’t provide witness statements and bounced the onus back on the court.
What are the current and most updated Family Procedure rules and how are they compatible with GDPR
If this is controversial it’s fine not to post this.
Hi Victoria, we can’t see anything that would mean we can’t publish your comment, so we have, but we don’t understand what procedures you are referring to.
Is anyone able to tell me how to register to attend the next CAFCASS open board meeting please?
Cafcass Twitter account is usually pretty responsive to enquiries.