info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Can a Prenup survive English law?

Can a Prenup survive English law?

by Guest Post | Mar 2, 2026 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

Spider-Man, Zendaya and the Prenup that might not save them This is a guest post by Salomé Ashenden. Salomé is a law graduate preparing for practice at the Bar. She holds a MSc in Science Communication from Imperial College London and has experience working as a...
The repeal of the presumption of involvement of both parents

The repeal of the presumption of involvement of both parents

by reporting watch team | Feb 26, 2026 | FCReportingWatch

We last wrote on this topic in October 2025 when Parliament had announced the intention to repeal the controversial presumption when time could be found. A review of the presumption found that it contributed to a perception of a pro-contact culture, even though the...
Experts and Alienating Behaviour: The Modern Approach

Experts and Alienating Behaviour: The Modern Approach

by Lucy R | Feb 23, 2026 | Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Last week saw publication of an important judgment from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in a case called Re Y (Experts and Alienating Behaviour: The Modern Approach) [2026] EWFC 38. The case involves now notorious family court expert...
‘Undoing’ an adoption – an update

‘Undoing’ an adoption – an update

by reporting watch team | Feb 20, 2026 | Explanation, FCReportingWatch

We’ve written before, (13 May 2021; 12 August 2021) about the very limited circumstances in which an adoption order can be set aside (sometimes described as ‘revoked’). The current law is that it is possible for an order to be set aside if the court...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup: Dec 25 to Jan 2026

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup: Dec 25 to Jan 2026

by reporting watch team | Feb 3, 2026 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to the Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family law, explain and comment on published family court judgments, and highlight other transparency news. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FAMILY LAW, TRANSPARENCY etc The Financial Times (£) invited...
Journalist allowed to read psychologist’s reports

Journalist allowed to read psychologist’s reports

by reporting watch team | Jan 29, 2026 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Open Reporting

A significant decision has been made by Mr Justice Poole in the High Court, allowing a journalist access to a number of psychological reports that were commissioned in family proceedings.  Although when a Transparency Order (TO) is made under the Reporting...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Melia E Welch on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Julie Doughty on Care order or Supervision Order?
  • Julie Doughty on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • anon on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair

Search for something in particular

More search options

July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.