v

Posts

Wood for Trees

Transparency is about understanding not information. Quality not quantity. Substance not form. So more judgments ≠ more transparency. And more open courts ≠ more transparency. And more and more and more and more and more information on a single website ≠ more...

read more

The transparency debate rolls on

Peggy Ray (Goodman Ray Solicitors) opens December’s edition of ‘Family Law’ with ‘comment’ that adds to the wider discussion about transparency. (Family Law is subscription only content I’m afraid for those following the debate who don’t have access to it. I always...

read more

How transparent can we be?

As its very new, we're still feeling our way through how we will run this project - and we have recently had to deal with the thorny issue of what the limits are on comments about individual cases. We have an "Editorial Policy" here, which sets out that we will and...

read more

Summary of Resolution response

Overall, the response is negative about any further publicity measures being introduced. Sources used are the experiences and views of Resolution members and the recent Brophy et al report. Resolution makes strong arguments for research and evaluations to be...

read more

Project News

In December we held a meeting of the project group via video link and as a result you'll now see that we have a number of new contributors to the blog, listed here. Welcome to David Burrows, Alice Twaite, David Chaplin and Jerry Lonsdale. Over the next little while...

read more