info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
When ‘transparency’ orders create opacity

When ‘transparency’ orders create opacity

by reporting watch team | Mar 24, 2026 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

[For further developments, see: Censorship by Meta? Update on Pringle v Nervo, 17 May 2026.] This story by the Good Law Project on 19 March – Liv Nervo: Court calls Pringle’s ‘shameful’ conduct ‘abuse’- is about a mother who wanted to publicise her family court...
The ‘Thatcherite’ VC and the Cake Maker

The ‘Thatcherite’ VC and the Cake Maker

by reporting watch team | Mar 18, 2026 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch

A family court case has hit the headlines over the past year, not so much for anything remarkable about the Family Law Act 1996 dispute in front of the judges, but because the husband (according to press reports) is friendly with prominent right wing politicians and...
New resources for litigants in person

New resources for litigants in person

by reporting watch team | Mar 9, 2026 | FCReportingWatch, Resources

Two recent publications are relevant to litigants in person (LiPs) in family courts who are conducting their own case without being represented by a lawyer. The first one is important because it is guidance that a LiP will need to follow. The second is of wider...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup: February 2026

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup: February 2026

by reporting watch team | Mar 3, 2026 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to the Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family law, explain and comment on published family court judgments, and highlight other transparency news. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FAMILY LAW, TRANSPARENCY etc The big story from the family...
The repeal of the presumption of involvement of both parents

The repeal of the presumption of involvement of both parents

by reporting watch team | Feb 26, 2026 | FCReportingWatch

We last wrote on this topic in October 2025 when Parliament had announced the intention to repeal the controversial presumption when time could be found. A review of the presumption found that it contributed to a perception of a pro-contact culture, even though the...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Ann on An Inquiry into the Secret Family Courts?
  • John Wood on Repeal of the presumption of parental involvement
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?

Search for something in particular

More search options

October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Sep    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child arrangements child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.