info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
‘Undoing’ an adoption – an update

‘Undoing’ an adoption – an update

by reporting watch team | Feb 20, 2026 | Explanation, FCReportingWatch

We’ve written before, (13 May 2021; 12 August 2021) about the very limited circumstances in which an adoption order can be set aside (sometimes described as ‘revoked’). The current law is that it is possible for an order to be set aside if the court...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup: Dec 25 to Jan 2026

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup: Dec 25 to Jan 2026

by reporting watch team | Feb 3, 2026 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Transparency News

Welcome to the Roundup, where we correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family law, explain and comment on published family court judgments, and highlight other transparency news. MEDIA COVERAGE OF FAMILY LAW, TRANSPARENCY etc The Financial Times (£) invited...
Journalist allowed to read psychologist’s reports

Journalist allowed to read psychologist’s reports

by reporting watch team | Jan 29, 2026 | Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Open Reporting

A significant decision has been made by Mr Justice Poole in the High Court, allowing a journalist access to a number of psychological reports that were commissioned in family proceedings.  Although when a Transparency Order (TO) is made under the Reporting...
Tributes to Sir James Munby, former President of the Family Division

Tributes to Sir James Munby, former President of the Family Division

by reporting watch team | Jan 21, 2026 | FCReportingWatch

We have collected some of the obituaries and public tributes to Sir James, focusing mainly on his contribution to family justice. Sir James was a proactive supporter of The Transparency Project. He passed away on 1st January. Patrick Kidd, ‘Outspoken leader of...
Rules for online court hearings – consultation

Rules for online court hearings – consultation

by reporting watch team | Jan 19, 2026 | Consultations, Court of Protection, FCReportingWatch

The Covid lockdown period provided unexpected opportunities to discover the advantages and disadvantages of holding court hearings ‘remotely’ online. Currently, family courts prefer to hold hearings in person but there’s a general move toward more...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Lainie on ‘Oh I’m sorry, did I forget to mention you don’t have to agree to this?’ When social workers forget that interventions under ‘Child in Need’ are voluntary
  • Julie Doughty on ‘Habitual Residence’ – sloppy explanations of the law about child abduction
  • Sidisi Henry on ‘Habitual Residence’ – sloppy explanations of the law about child abduction
  • Julie Doughty on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2
  • Michael Freeman on The Vice Chancellor and the Cake Maker – Part 2

Search for something in particular

More search options

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid COVID-19 CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation parental responsibility privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.