info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Right of audience denied: McKenzie Friend not allowed to speak for litigant who was ‘well able to speak on her own behalf’

Right of audience denied: McKenzie Friend not allowed to speak for litigant who was ‘well able to speak on her own behalf’

by Paul M | Jul 5, 2020 | Cases, Comment, Explanation

The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. In this case the judge, Mrs Justice Steyn, refused to allow the MF to make oral submissions on behalf of...
Civil Justice Council report on the impact of COVID-19 on civil courts

Civil Justice Council report on the impact of COVID-19 on civil courts

by Paul M | Jun 7, 2020 | Comment, Transparency News, Trends

“The rapid expansion of the use of remote hearings has been central to facilitating the continued operation of the justice system”, notes Dr Natalie Byrom in the introduction to her report, for the Civil Justice Council, examining the impact of the changes mandated by...
Civil Justice Council report on the impact of COVID-19 on civil courts

Civil Justice Council Rapid Consultation: The impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system

by Paul M | May 19, 2020 | Consultations, Transparency News, Trends

Following the rapid consultation on the use of remote hearings in the family justice system, undertaken by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory at the request of the President of the Family Division, the Civil Justice Council have now embarked on a similar...
Is Criminal Justice Under Lockdown Remotely Possible?

Is Criminal Justice Under Lockdown Remotely Possible?

by Paul M | May 11, 2020 | Comment, Transparency News, Trends

Justice suspended Nothing better represents our idea of justice being not only done but seen to be done than the spectacle of trial by jury in the Crown Court.  The arrangement of the physical space of the courtroom, the royal coat of arms behind the raised bench...
The future of journalism: our response to the inquiry

The future of journalism: our response to the inquiry

by Paul M | May 6, 2020 | Consultations, Trends

The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee is currently holding an inquiry into the future of journalism. “This inquiry will investigate how digital technologies are changing the production and consumption of journalism, how journalists can be...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • S on A failed reunification plan
  • Charles Prest on Sir James Munby’s greatest hits: an appreciation of his work
  • Lucy Reed on Sending a mother to prison for contempt of court
  • Lucy Reed on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Lucy Reed on Children and parents speak up about the Pathfinder in private law – new research published

Search for something in particular

More search options

February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
« Jan    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot mckenzie friends misconduct open justice parental alienation psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.