info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Privatisation of children’s services is bad for children and bad for taxpayers

Privatisation of children’s services is bad for children and bad for taxpayers

by Guest Post | Feb 17, 2021 | Comment

This is a guest post by Martin Barrow, journalist and local authority foster carer.  Martin tweets as @MartinBarrow When the Care Review was formally announced in January, one of the first actions of its chair, Josh MacAlister, was to ask the Competition and...
PD12J & Scott Schedules – Rearranging a Spider’s web

PD12J & Scott Schedules – Rearranging a Spider’s web

by Guest Post | Jan 30, 2021 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post from solicitor Jeremy Ford. Jeremy is a partner, mediator and children’s arbitrator at Cambridge Family Law Practice LLP. He tweets as @headofroy. It was originally published on LinkedIn. Sir Andrew McFarlane, the president of the family division,...
W (Children): judge’s recusal does not indicate bias

W (Children): judge’s recusal does not indicate bias

by Guest Post | Dec 18, 2020 | Cases, Comment, Explanation

This is a guest post by John Bolch, reproduced with kind permission from his Family Lore blog. Reading the case name W (Children: Reopening/recusal) I assumed that this would be another of those applications by a party, invariably the father, for the recusal of...
CHALLENGING ADOPTION REVISITED: RE C AND REVOCATION OF PLACEMENT ORDERS

CHALLENGING ADOPTION REVISITED: RE C AND REVOCATION OF PLACEMENT ORDERS

by Guest Post | Dec 6, 2020 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

This is a guest post by Mark Senior. Mark was a Solicitor specialising in family law for 9 years before moving to the Bar in 2002. He is based in Liverpool at St Johns Buildings Chambers. He tweets as @grumpyoldbrief. At the end of October a friend and colleague...
Remote Hearings in the Family of Courts of England and Wales: what the research shows

Remote Hearings in the Family of Courts of England and Wales: what the research shows

by Guest Post | Nov 13, 2020 | Comment

This is guest post by Eve French. Eve has just completed her Law Conversion course at BPP University and is currently working as a paralegal at Simpson Millar Solicitors LLP. Following a mini-pupillage, Eve was asked by 4PB to write a paper on the impact of the...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Melia E Welch on Hair strand testing – pitfalls and limitations
  • Julie Doughty on Care order or Supervision Order?
  • Julie Doughty on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair
  • Julie Doughty on A failed reunification plan
  • anon on Decision to place a child with prospective adopters is unlawful because unfair

Search for something in particular

More search options

July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence drug testing Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 judgments judiciary law courts legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions publication remotejustice reporting of family cases Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.