info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
An interesting judgment about reporting restrictions

An interesting judgment about reporting restrictions

by reporting watch team | Jan 17, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch

This post is about a case called : A and B (Children) [2018] EWHC 3491 (Fam) (20 December 2018). In this case the recently retired President of the Family Division Sir James Munby had to deal with an application for reporting restriction orders arising from care...
Journalists and legal bloggers sitting in a row

Journalists and legal bloggers sitting in a row

by Lucy R | Jan 16, 2019 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Legal blogging

Yesterday I had a commitment in London and was determined to do a bit of legal blogging whilst in town. I had skim-read the lists for the Family Division and Court of Appeal at the Royal Court of Justice before getting on the train, and planned to make my way there to...
Hi Sky, Corrected your misleading headline, love TP xxx

Hi Sky, Corrected your misleading headline, love TP xxx

by reporting watch team | Jan 13, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch

Thanks to Emily Ward for alerting us to this gem of a headline from Sky News : Man loses court fight over wife’s ‘flirtatious’ kisses on text messages.A family court judge has said a woman’s kisses on texts to her former husband are not proof...
Another runaway mum in the news – what’s the story?

Another runaway mum in the news – what’s the story?

by reporting watch team | Jan 6, 2019 | Cases, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Shortly before Christmas reports began to emerge of a young mother who had disappeared with her little boy, and of the High Court Judge who gave permission for the family to be publicly named and photos shown in order to help locate them. At the time we weren’t...
Was the risk really bad enough to justify the remedy?

Was the risk really bad enough to justify the remedy?

by Julie Doughty | Jan 3, 2019 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch

This question was asked by Lord Justice Peter Jackson in a judgment reported last month,  Re F (A Child: Placement Order: Proportionality) [2018] EWCA Civ 2761 The risk here was of future significant harm and the remedy was a closed adoption.  However, this...
Royals, resulting trusts, and representation

Royals, resulting trusts, and representation

by Polly Morgan | Dec 20, 2018 | Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch

In December 2017, I wrote about Privacy and the Princess, a case involving the divorce of two members of the Luxembourg royal family, Prince Louis and Princess Tessy. The hearing I discussed was about what could be reported about their financial positions given the...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Mom on Trauma in the Family Courts: the 2026 Family Law Breakfast
  • dad-victim on Frustrated: our attempts to report on family court hearing before Magistrates – a system in overload
  • Julie Doughty on Finding a journalist to attend your family court hearing
  • Kim Maharaj on Finding a journalist to attend your family court hearing
  • Dr Kate Hellin on The end of unregulated ‘expert’ witnesses in family courts?

Search for something in particular

More search options

August 2026
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jul    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 Article 10 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child arrangements child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts finances financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct Multi-disciplinary conference open justice parental alienation publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.