info@transparencyproject.org.uk
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project
  • Legal Blogging
  • Posts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • About
  • Who
  • Dictionary
  • Resources
  • Media
  • More search options
Select Page
Update on Charlie Gard case – The last stage of the litigation: facts and sources

Update on Charlie Gard case – The last stage of the litigation: facts and sources

by Barbara Rich | Aug 1, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

This post was originally posted on the morning of 1 August 2017 as a chronological update of developments in the case since we posted our last update on 18 July.  In the light of a comment in response, we thought it would be helpful to extend it to cover the whole of...
Kindertotenlieder and the limits of transparency

Kindertotenlieder and the limits of transparency

by Barbara Rich | Jul 23, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

Mahler’s Kindertotenlieder was on Radio 3 as I drove across London a week or so ago.  It’s music I’ve always found nearly unbearable to listen to, because it’s about the death of children. The poems Mahler set to music were written by the 19th century German poet...
Re W (Wonder of mobile internet)

Re W (Wonder of mobile internet)

by reporting watch team | Jul 20, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, FCReportingWatch

A curious article appeared in the Telegraph this week, headlined : Wonder of mobile internet means I can deal with cases on the move, top family court judge says It details the fact that Top Judges have opposable thumbs and are able to operate an iphone, just like...
Charlie Gard – What Did The European Court Actually Say and Why?

Charlie Gard – What Did The European Court Actually Say and Why?

by Allan Norman | Jul 5, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Comment, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

As is now well-known, Charlie Gard’s case reached the end of its legal road last week, when the European Court of Human Rights decided that his case, and the case brought on his behalf by his parents, was inadmissible. At the same time, it decided that the...
Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

Family Court Reporting Watch Roundup

by reporting watch team | Jul 3, 2017 | Analysis, FCReportingWatch

Correcting, clarifying or commenting on media reports of family court cases Explaining or commenting on published Judgments of family court cases Highlighting other transparency news MEDIA (MIS)REPORTS OF FAMILY COURTS CASES  Inaccurate, misleading or distorting ...
Charlie Gard Update

Charlie Gard Update

by reporting watch team | Jul 2, 2017 | Analysis, Cases, Explanation, FCReportingWatch, Notorious

We last wrote about the case of Charlie Gard when the European Court was still considering Charlie’s parents’ application. Since then the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) have rejected the application as inadmissible (decision here), meaning that the...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Subscribe to our posts

Recent Comments

  • Ann on An Inquiry into the Secret Family Courts?
  • John Wood on Repeal of the presumption of parental involvement
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?
  • Julie Doughty on A family damaged by court proceedings?

Search for something in particular

More search options

October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Sep    
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Comment
  • Consultations
  • Court of Protection
  • Dictionary
  • Events
  • Explanation
  • FCReportingWatch
  • FOI
  • Guidance Note
  • Legal blogging
  • Notorious
  • Open Reporting
  • Project
  • Reporting Pilot
  • Resources
  • Transparency News
  • Trends
  • Uncategorized

access to courts data adoption Adoption targets alienation anonymisation Article 8 assisted dying Cafcass care proceedings child arrangements child protection children's views committal contempt of court correctionrequests court of protection covid CPConf2016 divorce domestic abuse domesticabuse domestic violence Expert Evidence. experts financial remedy FLJ forced adoption guidancenote Human Rights Act 1998 journalist judgments judiciary legal aid legalbloggingpilot misconduct open justice parental alienation pathfinder privacy injunctions psychologists publication remotejustice Section 20 agreements social work transparency

  • Facebook
  • X
The Transparency Project, Charity Number 1161471.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.